Here, let me recount what I told Mister Goodsir. It is quite long, so please take your time and ask any questions you need of me.
My accusation was built on very simple facts, with no assumptions involved.
1. Homelander was killed by a strong individual, who cut him in two with an axe.
2. Any one of the pumpkin-headed kills from last round involved strangulation, and then removal of the head by various means. ( I said they were all the same to see who felt the need correct me defensively, and it was Faith. Strike one. )
3. A this time, I am still catching up on the information surrounding the new deaths.
In two instances, different and unique weapons were involved. An axe, a strangling tool — a garrote, I believe was the conclusion? By Buffy's own admission, a Slayer is good at using any weapon placed in their hand. The versatility of kills between rounds one and two suggests a Slayer is involved.
I am willing to bet there is a unique weapon kill this time that would only add to the claim that either Miss Faith or! Miss Buffy was involved. And then I asked Mister Goodsir if he knew what weapons and methods were commonly used to kill vampires, to see if I could tie the weapons of choice/style of kills to the Slayers.
Also, I chose Miss Faith over Miss Buffy for a few reasons: as a wolf, she would benefit from the wrong Slayer going to jail and Miss Buffy was accused first; and, Miss Faith — the wolf I accused — is trying to discredit me by calling her a vampire, with someone within the vampire chat "tipping her off" ( Strike two. ). Which means someone trying to protect her additionally, but is not informing Miss Buffy on me.
But, I'm not a vampire. I alleged I was, and was let in so that I could hopefully a) court their vote, if they had a bloc or b) gather more information on one of our aforementioned accused.
Faith wouldn't know she's a wolf, so any defensive tone or reaction is only natural. I wouldn't want to be accused either. I could strangle, slice, stab, axe, all of those things. Maybe not with a slayer's force, but I could.
I alleged it. Miss Katherine let me into the group chat, without interrogating it.
Nobody else has put forth someone for Homelander's death. She has the super strength, and the versatility with weapons to accomplish any of the deaths in the second and third round of killings.
I agree it seems vindictive of me, but we both agreed last round that we don't know one another at all — I have no grievance against her. In fact, I want to help her. Miss Buffy said... she would punish herself for this, and if I am wrong I will accept her hate and vengeance. But, if I am right... I want her to know someone gave it their all to save her.
That's what I really want. I think she's a good girl that Miss Buffy loves, and I want to help her if she's a wolf. So, I must continue to believe she is a wolf, and see this through.
She is. An old one, who prefers her enjoyment to anything else.
Then, that would mean two "wolves" accused one another. Not exactly the most likely result, statistically speaking. It's less than a 2% chance that, even unknowingly, they could name one another.
I am focusing on Homelander's death, and attributing a Slayer to it. The wolves are obscuring their kills, we know that and I am keeping my thoughts simple. With Buffy having prior beef with Homelander, her choosing to kill him would present a very obvious path to a vote.
Faith killing him would be a layer to hide behind, as the wolves have been leaving hair on other people, hiding weapons, causing all sorts of people to question themselves and one another... it'd work as the wolves' modus operandi.
I am not thinking myself in circles once I have decided something. I may be wrong in the end, but it will not be because I paralyzed myself.
I have no bias against Faith. I am not a vampire who hates Slayers, and I do not know her at all. If there is a bias... it's just that I believe it's her, and she needs to know someone tried to catch her. So that she can maybe begin to heal from the pain she will feel, after this game concludes.
All the time! I'm actually the one thinking outside the box right now, because the box is "everyone else second-guessing their work, mixing up evidence and going around in circles"!
You all keep saying that I do not have evidence, but once again — I do. It is you all who cannot produce another candidate for Homelander's death, using that same evidence.
Super strength and versatility of weaponry narrows the pool down to Buffy and Faith. Name another party, if you want me to recant. I am putting forth the Slayers, with my preference being on Faith. Even Buffy is okay with this.
I'm not scared. I deal with stuff like this all the time back home!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
How can I help, Mister Dean?
no subject
Do you see anything that clearly lumps you in with all of us?
no subject
I do not care if it was to mock or distract, I am accusing Faith again.
no subject
Why not Buffy? What if you were on the right track but wrong about the slayer.
If you're accusing Faith, who'd she do?
no subject
My accusation was built on very simple facts, with no assumptions involved.
1. Homelander was killed by a strong individual, who cut him in two with an axe.
2. Any one of the pumpkin-headed kills from last round involved strangulation, and then removal of the head by various means. ( I said they were all the same to see who felt the need correct me defensively, and it was Faith. Strike one. )
3. A this time, I am still catching up on the information surrounding the new deaths.
In two instances, different and unique weapons were involved. An axe, a strangling tool — a garrote, I believe was the conclusion? By Buffy's own admission, a Slayer is good at using any weapon placed in their hand. The versatility of kills between rounds one and two suggests a Slayer is involved.
I am willing to bet there is a unique weapon kill this time that would only add to the claim that either Miss Faith or! Miss Buffy was involved. And then I asked Mister Goodsir if he knew what weapons and methods were commonly used to kill vampires, to see if I could tie the weapons of choice/style of kills to the Slayers.
Also, I chose Miss Faith over Miss Buffy for a few reasons: as a wolf, she would benefit from the wrong Slayer going to jail and Miss Buffy was accused first; and, Miss Faith — the wolf I accused — is trying to discredit me by calling her a vampire, with someone within the vampire chat "tipping her off" ( Strike two. ). Which means someone trying to protect her additionally, but is not informing Miss Buffy on me.
But, I'm not a vampire. I alleged I was, and was let in so that I could hopefully a) court their vote, if they had a bloc or b) gather more information on one of our aforementioned accused.
no subject
Faith wouldn't know she's a wolf, so any defensive tone or reaction is only natural. I wouldn't want to be accused either. I could strangle, slice, stab, axe, all of those things. Maybe not with a slayer's force, but I could.
You really have it in for her.
no subject
Nobody else has put forth someone for Homelander's death. She has the super strength, and the versatility with weapons to accomplish any of the deaths in the second and third round of killings.
I agree it seems vindictive of me, but we both agreed last round that we don't know one another at all — I have no grievance against her. In fact, I want to help her. Miss Buffy said... she would punish herself for this, and if I am wrong I will accept her hate and vengeance. But, if I am right... I want her to know someone gave it their all to save her.
That's what I really want. I think she's a good girl that Miss Buffy loves, and I want to help her if she's a wolf. So, I must continue to believe she is a wolf, and see this through.
no subject
So would Buffy.
What if Buffy's the wolf.
no subject
Then, that would mean two "wolves" accused one another. Not exactly the most likely result, statistically speaking. It's less than a 2% chance that, even unknowingly, they could name one another.
I am focusing on Homelander's death, and attributing a Slayer to it. The wolves are obscuring their kills, we know that and I am keeping my thoughts simple. With Buffy having prior beef with Homelander, her choosing to kill him would present a very obvious path to a vote.
Faith killing him would be a layer to hide behind, as the wolves have been leaving hair on other people, hiding weapons, causing all sorts of people to question themselves and one another... it'd work as the wolves' modus operandi.
no subject
But, again, a wolf wouldn't know they were a wolf and August isn't a wolf? He wasn't beheaded like Shauna and Saber.
In your opinion. Which is biased, you said it yourself, against Faith.
no subject
I have no bias against Faith. I am not a vampire who hates Slayers, and I do not know her at all. If there is a bias... it's just that I believe it's her, and she needs to know someone tried to catch her. So that she can maybe begin to heal from the pain she will feel, after this game concludes.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I know I haven't played this game smart, but you, sir, vampire or not, are asking for it.
no subject
Super strength and versatility of weaponry narrows the pool down to Buffy and Faith. Name another party, if you want me to recant. I am putting forth the Slayers, with my preference being on Faith. Even Buffy is okay with this.
I'm not scared. I deal with stuff like this all the time back home!
no subject
I'm a hunter. Name a weapon, I've cleaned it, worked it, built it or improvised with it. I've taken down stronger demons, vampires, spirits...
But, there's nothing tying me to Homelander's death. Also, Homelander was human at the time. I could cut a vampire in half and they're not human.
You also don't know what else is out here in this commune. There's talk of a werewolf. A hybrid with an alibi. An archer.
You can't know who's good with what. Not possible. Also, you ever actually seen or heard of what a slayer is? Before landing here?