My accusation was built on very simple facts, with no assumptions involved.
1. Homelander was killed by a strong individual, who cut him in two with an axe.
2. Any one of the pumpkin-headed kills from last round involved strangulation, and then removal of the head by various means. ( I said they were all the same to see who felt the need correct me, and once again: Faith. )
3. A this time, I am still catching up on the information surrounding the new deaths.
In two instances, different and unique weapons were involved. An axe, a strangling tool — a garrote, I believe was the conclusion? By Buffy's own admission, a Slayer is good at using any weapon placed in their hand. The versatility of kills between rounds one and two suggests a Slayer is involved.
I am willing to bet there is a unique kill with a weapon even now, that would only add to the claim that either Miss Faith or Miss Buffy was involved. Do you know what weapons are common to Slayers killing vampires, Mister Goodsir? If not, I suggest you look into it.
no subject
1. Homelander was killed by a strong individual, who cut him in two with an axe.
2. Any one of the pumpkin-headed kills from last round involved strangulation, and then removal of the head by various means. ( I said they were all the same to see who felt the need correct me, and once again: Faith. )
3. A this time, I am still catching up on the information surrounding the new deaths.
In two instances, different and unique weapons were involved. An axe, a strangling tool — a garrote, I believe was the conclusion? By Buffy's own admission, a Slayer is good at using any weapon placed in their hand. The versatility of kills between rounds one and two suggests a Slayer is involved.
I am willing to bet there is a unique kill with a weapon even now, that would only add to the claim that either Miss Faith or Miss Buffy was involved. Do you know what weapons are common to Slayers killing vampires, Mister Goodsir? If not, I suggest you look into it.
no subject